Examining the Effectiveness of an Empathy Training Program in Reducing School Bullying and Enhancing Social Acceptance among Students
Keywords:
Empathy training, school bullying, social acceptance, students, semi-structured interviews, thematic analysis, TehranAbstract
This study aimed to explore the perceived effectiveness of an empathy training program in reducing school bullying and enhancing social acceptance among students in Tehran. This qualitative evaluative study was conducted among 24 lower-secondary students in Tehran who had participated in an empathy training program. Participants were selected through purposive maximum-variation sampling. Data were collected only through semi-structured interviews and continued until theoretical saturation was achieved. Saturation occurred at the twenty-first interview, and three additional interviews were conducted to ensure data adequacy. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic analysis with the assistance of NVivo software. To enhance trustworthiness, member checking, peer debriefing, an audit trail, constant comparison, and reflexive memo-writing were used. The analysis yielded five main categories: “development of perspective-taking and emotional understanding,” “reduction of overt and covert bullying behaviors,” “strengthening supportive peer and bystander roles,” “enhancement of social acceptance and reconstruction of classroom relationships,” and “conditions for sustaining program effects in school.” Participants reported that the program helped them better understand the emotional consequences of ridicule, exclusion, labeling, and peer rejection. They also described improvements in self-control, respectful communication, defending victimized peers, and including socially isolated classmates in group activities. The findings suggest that empathy training can contribute to reducing school bullying and enhancing social acceptance by increasing emotional awareness, challenging the normalization of bullying, activating constructive bystander responses, and strengthening supportive classroom norms. However, the sustainability of these outcomes depends on teacher involvement, school-level follow-up, reinforcement of communication skills, and integration of empathy-based practices into the daily culture of classrooms.
Downloads
References
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x
Gaffney, H., Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2021). Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying perpetration and victimization: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 17(2), e1143. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1143
Gini, G., Albiero, P., Benelli, B., & Altoè, G. (2007). Does empathy predict adolescents’ bullying and defending behavior? Aggressive Behavior, 33(5), 467–476. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20204
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
Hymel, S., & Swearer, S. M. (2015). Four decades of research on school bullying: An introduction. American Psychologist, 70(4), 293–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038928
Juvonen, J., & Graham, S. (2014). Bullying in schools: The power of bullies and the plight of victims. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 159–185. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115030
Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954–2965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
Nickerson, A. B., Mele, D., & Princiotta, D. (2008). Attachment and empathy as predictors of roles as defenders or outsiders in bullying interactions. Journal of School Psychology, 46(6), 687–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2008.06.002
Salmivalli, C. (2014). Participant roles in bullying: How can peer bystanders be utilized in interventions? Theory Into Practice, 53(4), 286–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2014.947222
Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1996)22:1%3C1::AID-AB1%3E3.0.CO;2-T
Şahin, M. (2012). An investigation into the efficiency of empathy training program on preventing bullying in primary schools. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(7), 1325–1330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.03.013
Silva, J. L., Oliveira, W. A., Carlos, D. M., Lizzi, E. A. S., Rosário, R., & Silva, M. A. I. (2019). Bullying, social skills, peer acceptance, and friendship among students in school transition. Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas), 36, e180068. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0275201936e180068
Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2011). Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: A systematic and meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7(1), 27–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-010-9109-1
Van Noorden, T. H. J., Haselager, G. J. T., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Bukowski, W. M. (2015). Empathy and involvement in bullying in children and adolescents: A systematic review. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44(3), 637–657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-014-0135-6
