The Effectiveness of Social–Emotional Skills Training in Reducing Relational Aggression and Promoting Prosocial Behaviors among Students

Authors

  • نیازی Niazi Department of School Counseling, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran.
  • Hossein Moradi Department of School Counseling, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran Author
  • Amir Reza Kamali Pour Department of School Counseling, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran Author

Keywords:

Social–emotional learning, relational aggression, prosocial behavior, students, thematic analysis, Tehran

Abstract

This study aimed to explore students’ lived experiences of the perceived effectiveness of social–emotional skills training in reducing relational aggression and enhancing prosocial behaviors in school settings. This qualitative study employed a thematic analysis design. The participants consisted of 24 lower-secondary school students from Tehran who were purposively selected from among students who had participated in a school-based social–emotional skills training program. Data were collected exclusively through semi-structured interviews and continued until theoretical saturation was reached. Initial saturation occurred after the twenty-first interview, and three additional interviews were conducted to confirm the stability and adequacy of the emerging categories. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed through iterative coding, constant comparison, theme development, and thematic refinement using NVivo software. To enhance trustworthiness, member checking, peer debriefing, analytic memo writing, and continuous comparison between codes and interview excerpts were employed. Data analysis led to the identification of five main categories: “emotional self-awareness and reduction of impulsive reactions,” “empathy and weakening of exclusion and rumor-spreading,” “communication and conflict-resolution skills in peer relationships,” “promotion of prosocial behaviors and collective responsibility,” and “contextual conditions influencing the sustainability or erosion of training effects.” Students described that social–emotional training helped them recognize anger and jealousy, pause before reacting, understand the emotional consequences of exclusion, and replace indirect hostility with dialogue, apology, support, and cooperation. The most frequently reported changes included decreased intentional exclusion, reduced gossiping, greater willingness to help isolated classmates, and improved collaboration in group activities. The findings suggest that social–emotional skills training can serve as a school-based strategy for reducing relational aggression and strengthening prosocial behaviors among students. However, the durability of these perceived effects depends on teacher support, family involvement, classroom climate, peer norms, and continued opportunities to practice social–emotional competencies in real school situations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Archer, J., & Coyne, S. M. (2005). An integrated review of indirect, relational, and social aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(3), 212–230. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0903_2

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Card, N. A., Stucky, B. D., Sawalani, G. M., & Little, T. D. (2008). Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment. Child Development, 79(5), 1185–1229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01184.x

Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning. (2020). CASEL’s SEL framework: What are the core competence areas and where are they promoted? CASEL. https://casel.org/casel-sel-framework-11-2020/

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Crick, N. R. (1996). The role of overt aggression, relational aggression, and prosocial behavior in the prediction of children’s future social adjustment. Child Development, 67(5), 2317–2327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01859.x

Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66(3), 710–722. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131945

Denham, S. A. (2006). Social-emotional competence as support for school readiness: What is it and how do we assess it? Early Education and Development, 17(1), 57–89. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15566935eed1701_4

Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x

Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Spinrad, T. L. (2006). Prosocial development. In W. Damon, R. M. Lerner, & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., pp. 646–718). Wiley.

Greenberg, M. T., Weissberg, R. P., O’Brien, M. U., Zins, J. E., Fredericks, L., Resnik, H., & Elias, M. J. (2003). Enhancing school-based prevention and youth development through coordinated social, emotional, and academic learning. American Psychologist, 58(6–7), 466–474. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.6-7.466

Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903

Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2009). The prosocial classroom: Teacher social and emotional competence in relation to student and classroom outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 491–525. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325693

Jones, S. M., & Bouffard, S. M. (2012). Social and emotional learning in schools: From programs to strategies. Social Policy Report, 26(4), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2379-3988.2012.tb00073.x

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Salmivalli, C. (2010). Bullying and the peer group: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15(2), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2009.08.007

Taylor, R. D., Oberle, E., Durlak, J. A., & Weissberg, R. P. (2017). Promoting positive youth development through school-based social and emotional learning interventions: A meta-analysis of follow-up effects. Child Development, 88(4), 1156–1171. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12864

Weissberg, R. P., Durlak, J. A., Domitrovich, C. E., & Gullotta, T. P. (Eds.). (2015). Handbook of social and emotional learning: Research and practice. Guilford Press.

Zins, J. E., Weissberg, R. P., Wang, M. C., & Walberg, H. J. (Eds.). (2004). Building academic success on social and emotional learning: What does the research say? Teachers College Press.

Downloads

Publication Timeline

Published

How to Cite

Niazi ن., Moradi, H., & Kamali Pour, A. R. . (1404). The Effectiveness of Social–Emotional Skills Training in Reducing Relational Aggression and Promoting Prosocial Behaviors among Students. Psychology, Education, and Human Development in Schools, 1(3), 1-15. https://jehds.com/index.php/jehds/article/view/14